A dynamic modeling study on the effects of Wuhan traffic control and centralized quarantine measures on COVID-19 epidemic. (Special Issue: Spatio-temporal dynamics analysis, risk assessment and emergency management for COVID-19 epidemic.) [Chinese]

Objective: To quantitatively evaluate the effects of traffic control and centralized quarantine measures on COVID-19 epidemic in Wuhan, so as to provide scientific basis for epidemic prevention and control. Methods The SEIAHR model was established based on SEIR dynamic model, which took into account the characteristics of asymptomatic carriers and unconfirmed quarantined patients. Based on the timing of prevention measures, the epidemic was divided into three stages, the parameters were fitted, the basic reproduction numbers of different stages were calculated, and the development trend of epidemic was predicted. Results The R0 decreased dramatically. The R0 of the three stages were 3.684 1(95%CI: 3.106 1-4.048 0), 2.178 8(95%CI: 1.725 8-3.577 6)and 0.362 5(95%CI: 0.349 9-0.367 6), respectively. Due to the traffic control travel and centralized quarantine, the peak of the disease moved forward from April 19 to March 14, 2020. The scale of the epidemic had also been reduced by prevention and control measures. Conclusion The traffic control and centralized quarantine measures implemented in Wuhan were effective for the epidemic control, which can provide reference for other countries.

Estimating the time interval between transmission generations and the presymptomatic period by contact tracing surveillance data from 31 provinces in the mainland of China

The global pandemic of 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is a great assault to public health. Presymptomatic transmission cannot be controlled with measures designed for symptomatic persons, such as isolation. This study aimed to estimate the interval of the transmission generation (TG) and the presymptomatic period of COVID-19, and compare the fitting effects of TG and serial interval (SI) based on the SEIHR model incorporating the surveillance data of 3453 cases in 31 provinces. These data were allocated into three distributions and the value of AIC presented that the Weibull distribution fitted well. The mean of TG was 5.2 days (95% CI: 4.6-5.8). The mean of the presymptomatic period was 2.4 days (95% CI: 1.5-3.2). The dynamic model using TG as the generation time performed well. Eight provinces exhibited a basic reproduction number from 2.16 to 3.14. Measures should be taken to control presymptomatic transmission in the COVID-19 pandemic.

Massive migration promotes the early spread of COVID-19 in China: a study based on a scale-free network.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic met coincidentally with massive migration before Lunar New Year in China in early 2020. This study is to investigate the relationship between the massive migration and the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic in China. METHODS: The epidemic data between January 25th and February 15th and migration data between Jan 1st and Jan 24th were collected from the official websites. Using the R package WGCNA, we established a scale-free network of the selected cities. Correlation analysis was applied to describe the correlation between the Spring Migration and COVID-19 epidemic. RESULTS: The epidemic seriousness in Hubei (except the city of Wuhan) was closely correlated with the migration from Wuhan between January 10 and January 24, 2020. The epidemic seriousness in the other provinces, municipalities and autonomous regions was largely affected by the immigration from Wuhan. By establishing a scale-free network of the regions, we divided the regions into two modules. The regions in the brown module consisted of three municipalities, nine provincial capitals and other 12 cities. The COVID-19 epidemics in these regions were more likely to be aggravated by migration. CONCLUSIONS: The migration from Wuhan could partly explain the epidemic seriousness in Hubei Province and other regions. The scale-free network we have established can better evaluate the epidemic. Three municipalities (Beijing, Shanghai and Tianjin), eight provincial capitals (including Nanjing, Changsha et al.) and 12 other cities (including Qingdao, Zhongshan, Shenzhen et al.) were hub cities in the spread of COVID-19 in China.

Spatial statistical analysis of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) in China.

The cluster of pneumonia cases linked to coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19), first reported in China in late December 2019 raised global concern, particularly as the cumulative number of cases reported between 10 January and 5 March 2020 reached 80,711. In order to better understand the spread of this new virus, we characterized the spatial patterns of Covid-19 cumulative cases using ArcGIS v.10.4.1 based on spatial autocorrelation and cluster analysis using Global Moran's I (Moran, 1950), Local Moran's I and Getis-Ord General G (Ord and Getis, 2001). Up to 5 March 2020, Hubei Province, the origin of the Covid-19 epidemic, had reported 67,592 Covid-19 cases, while the confirmed cases in the surrounding provinces Guangdong, Henan, Zhejiang and Hunan were 1351, 1272, 1215 and 1018, respectively. The top five regions with respect to incidence were the following provinces: Hubei (11.423/10,000), Zhejiang (0.212/10,000), Jiangxi (0.201/10,000), Beijing (0.196/10,000) and Chongqing (0.186/10,000). Global Moran's I analysis results showed that the incidence of Covid-19 is not negatively correlated in space (p=0.407413>0.05) and the High-Low cluster analysis demonstrated that there were no high-value incidence clusters (p=0.076098>0.05), while Local Moran's I analysis indicated that Hubei is the only province with High-Low aggregation (p<0.0001).

Linking key intervention timings to rapid declining effective reproduction number to quantify lessons against COVID-19.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is currently under a global pandemic trend. The efficiency of containment measures and epidemic tendency of typical countries should be assessed. In this study, the efficiency of prevention and control measures in China, Italy, Iran, South Korea, and Japan was assessed, and the COVID-19 epidemic tendency among these countries was compared. Results showed that the effective reproduction number(Re) in Wuhan, China increased almost exponentially, reaching a maximum of 3.98 before a lockdown and rapidly decreased to below 1 due to containment and mitigation strategies of the Chinese government. The Re in Italy declined at a slower pace than that in China after the implementation of prevention and control measures. The Re in Iran showed a certain decline after the establishment of a national epidemic control command, and an evident stationary phase occurred because the best window period for the prevention and control of the epidemic was missed. The epidemic in Japan and South Korea reoccurred several times with the Re fluctuating greatly. The epidemic has hardly rebounded in China due to the implementation of prevention and control strategies and the effective enforcement of policies. Other countries suffering from the epidemic could learn from the Chinese experience in containing COVID-19.